HN
Today

The only moat left is money?

This post argues that AI has commoditized creation, making attention the new scarce resource and effectively locking out new entrants without significant capital or existing reach. It posits that the 'moat' for success is no longer skill or effort, but simply money. The Hacker News community fiercely debates this premise, offering numerous counterarguments rooted in creativity, problem-solving, and the true nature of 'hard' work.

70
Score
93
Comments
#4
Highest Rank
5h
on Front Page
First Seen
Feb 18, 4:00 PM
Last Seen
Feb 18, 8:00 PM
Rank Over Time
415172027

The Lowdown

The author contends that the advent of AI has fundamentally altered the landscape of internet entrepreneurship, shifting the scarcity from creation to attention. With AI enabling the rapid, low-effort generation of numerous products, the market is saturated, and traditional marketing channels are less effective. This creates a difficult environment for new ventures without pre-existing reach or substantial capital, suggesting that money has become the ultimate, perhaps only, remaining 'moat'.

  • AI-Driven Saturation: AI empowers individuals to rapidly develop and launch products, leading to an overwhelming influx of similar offerings.
  • Shift in Scarcity: The ease of creation means that 'attention' is now the scarce and valuable resource, not the ability to build.
  • Erosion of Traditional Moats: Skill and effort, once differentiators, are devalued as AI lowers the barrier to entry, making it harder for quality to stand out.
  • The Power of Reach and Capital: Success increasingly depends on existing audience reach or the financial means to acquire it, effectively creating a high barrier for new market participants.
  • The Author's Experiment: The author launched a niche, invite-only social network (Kith) with limited success, reinforcing their observation about the difficulty of organic growth without a head start or money.

Ultimately, the piece paints a picture of a digital economy where the playing field is heavily tilted towards those with pre-existing advantages, raising concerns that innovative new entrants are being systematically locked out unless they possess significant capital or an established audience.

The Gossip

Beyond the Buck: Real Moats in the AI Era

Many commenters pushed back on the idea that money is the *only* moat, proposing a variety of alternatives. Creativity, originality, and genuine problem-solving were frequently cited as enduring differentiators, with some arguing that the value of *unoriginal* thinking has decreased, but true innovation is more valuable than ever. Others highlighted customer relationships, unique taste, proprietary data, specialized knowledge, and strong community building as powerful, non-monetary moats. However, some conceded that even creativity can be quickly copied without other protective factors like brand or trust.

AI's Amplification of Market Saturation

There was broad agreement that AI is accelerating market saturation, creating a 'hyper-version' of past tech booms (like web 1.0 or crypto). While AI lowers the barrier to creating products, it also dramatically increases noise and competition for human attention. This leads to an abundance of easily replicated products that may not solve real problems effectively, raising questions about whether current AI-driven 'productivity' translates to actual value or merely more 'slop'. Some pointed out that the author's own product (Kith) might struggle not due to AI, but due to fundamental challenges in bootstrapping a social network.

The Enduring Value of 'Hard' and 'Real' Creation

A significant portion of the discussion centered on the nature of 'hard' work and 'real' problems. Commenters argued that true difficulty, deep insight, and building for genuinely unmet needs (especially outside generic web apps) remain powerful moats. While AI makes *easy* things easier, it simultaneously elevates the importance of tackling complex, often unglamorous, problems in domains like physical infrastructure, scientific instrumentation, or knowledge preservation. The sentiment was that focusing on genuinely 'hard and useful' endeavors, rather than chasing quick app-based wins, is where lasting value and differentiation will be found.