HN
Today

Quirks of Human Anatomy

This article dives deep into the anatomical 'quirks' of the human body, from our inverted retina to the convoluted vas deferens, explaining them as relics of our evolutionary past. It's a fascinating look at how evolution often 'tinkers' rather than designs optimally, sparking Hacker News's collective engineering mind to ponder biological 'bugs' and hypothetical 'refactorings'. The discussion revels in these perceived design flaws, drawing parallels to software development and contemplating the limits of genetic intervention.

28
Score
12
Comments
#12
Highest Rank
6h
on Front Page
First Seen
Apr 26, 7:00 AM
Last Seen
Apr 26, 12:00 PM
Rank Over Time
151212161620

The Lowdown

Lewis Held's "Quirks of Human Anatomy" meticulously catalogues several suboptimal human anatomical features, presenting them not as defects but as historical artifacts of our evolutionary journey. The piece highlights how these quirks, while sometimes inconvenient or even dangerous, reveal the improvisational nature of evolution, which often builds upon existing structures rather than starting anew.

  • Ear Wiggling Muscles: Vestigial muscles that serve no apparent function beyond a party trick.
  • Inverted Retina & Blind Spot: Photoreceptors are behind ganglion cells, leading to a 'blind spot' where the optic nerve exits. This geometry is traced back to a protochordate ancestor whose superficial nerve net was internalized.
  • Crowded Teeth: Modern humans often have issues with wisdom teeth due to the evolutionary shortening of our jaw.
  • Branchial Arches: Embryonic structures that are remnants of our fish ancestors.
  • Male Nipples: Useless in males, a side effect of shared developmental pathways.
  • Choking Hazard: The shared pathway for air and food, a result of lungs evolving from the eating tube, makes choking a risk. Babies and many mammals avoid this due to a higher larynx.
  • Painful Childbirth: The tight fit and necessary rotation of a baby's head through the human pelvis is a difficult evolutionary compromise, contrasting with the easier exits in other species (and the extreme case of the spotted hyena).
  • Back Pain: The spine's sinusoidal shape contributes to lumbar strains and herniated disks.
  • Long Vas Deferens: A circuitous route for sperm delivery, much longer than necessary due to evolutionary history.
  • Prostate Obstruction: The urethra passes through the prostate, risking strangulation if the gland enlarges.
  • May-Thurner Syndrome: An asymmetrical compression of the left iliac vein due to its anatomical relationship with the abdominal aorta.
  • Ectopic Pregnancy: The gap between the ovary and oviduct can lead to dangerous 'tubal' pregnancies if an embryo implants prematurely.

The article also delves into the evolutionary history of the eye, comparing human 'simple' eyes with insect 'compound' eyes, and reflecting on how even seemingly perfect biological systems are the result of countless incremental adaptations rather than perfect design. The author uses references from various scientific works, emphasizing the 'tinkering' aspect of evolution as described by François Jacob.

Ultimately, the piece illustrates that our bodies are a living museum of evolutionary compromises, full of 'good enough' solutions that have persisted despite their imperfections, a testament to the powerful, yet often non-optimal, process of natural selection.

The Gossip

Evolution's Engineering Eccentricities

Commenters enthusiastically embraced the theme of 'evolutionary design flaws,' pointing out additional anatomical quirks that seem poorly optimized. The testicles residing outside the body (with the explanation of temperature sensitivity) and the ridiculously long recurrent laryngeal nerve (especially in giraffes) were popular examples. Many drew parallels between these biological 'bugs' and bad software architecture, highlighting how initial 'design decisions' can constrain future improvements, making some 'fixes' effectively impossible without a complete 'refactor' or 'rewrite'.

Cerebral Compensation & Blind Spot Brainteasers

One specific detail about the brain's handling of the blind spot generated discussion. While the article states the brain 'fills in gaps by interpolation,' a commenter posited that it might be more akin to a neural network's robustness, where higher-level pattern recognition can function despite missing input, rather than actively 'reconstructing' the missing visual information. This offered a different, more AI-centric perspective on how the brain manages sensory imperfections.

Biological Bytes and Agile Anatomy

Several commenters connected the evolutionary process to software development methodologies. Evolution was likened to 'Agile' development, constantly responding to change over following a plan, embracing the idea that 'perfect is the enemy of good.' The concept of 'Chesterton's Fence' (not removing a feature without understanding its purpose) was also invoked, cautioning against impulsive 'refactoring' of biological systems, even as some humorously imagined 'CRISPR elves' from genetic manipulation.